Impressive Tips About How To Write A Referee Report Economics

It should include a summary of the paper that highlights the main question being posed, the methodology being used, and the conclusions reached by the author.

How to write a referee report economics. For the editorial process to be successful, a few things are paramount: Writing a good referee report. Drawing on insights of current and past editors of top economics and finance journals, we provide guidelines for reviewers in preparing referee reports and cover letters for journals.

To describe what the paper does; Are there problems with measurement error or other aspects of data quality? This is another “good” kind of negative report to get.

However, we urge you to seek out journal‐specific guidelines when they are available. Overall, don’t be afraid to have strong opinions (and perhaps be wrong), but be precise throughout. To point out and describe problems in the paper;

Also see our companion paper, how to write an effective referee report and improve the scientific review process, which includes comments by former editors of economics and finance journals. Most subjective part of the report, and the core explanation of your recommendation. Drawing on insights of current and past editors of top economics and finance journals, we provide guidelines for reviewers in preparing referee reports and cover letters for journals.

Each report should have around 3 pages. Here i want to outline the specifics of what we at the jci are looking for in a referee report. Turner brown university spring 2024.

Peer review is fundamental to the progress of science and we believe that fundamental changes in reviewing practices are needed to improve the integrity,. Two referees of your paper give conflicting reports. Preamble editors vary in what they seek in a referee report.

1) giving appropriate weight to the importance and innovativeness of a paper (and not being distracted that such papers may have minor flaws); Request pdf | how to write an effective referee report and improve the scientific review process | the review process for academic journals in economics has grown vastly more extensive over time. 2) drawing a clear and explicit separation between comments that must be dealt with to make the paper publi.

For an empirical paper, the type of paper we focus on in this course, there are a variety of things a referee will consider when writing a report. Point out to the editor in “comments intended solely for the editor” that. Your report should be approximately three double spaced pages in length.

To describe whether and why the paper is important or interesting; Harvey & david hirshleifer, 2017. Peer review is a crucial part of scholarly communication.

To identify and highlight what is going right and what is going wrong in the reviewing process, we wrote to a sample of former editors of the american economic review, the journal of political economy, the quarterly journal of economics, econometrica, the review of economic studies, and the journal of financial economics, and asked them. As part of the course you are asked to write three referee reports. Mention in your response letter the supportive views of the “positive” referee.